(E-E) Ev.g.e.n.i.j ..K.o.z.l.o.v Berlin |
home // E-E // biographie // art // eros // Leningrad 80s // Valentin Kozlov // 2 x 3m // events // sitemap // kontakt /
/ |
(E-E) Evgenij Kozlov: Leningrad 80s • No.115 >>
4. The End of Censorship
It is usually considered that censorship was the main obstacle to free expression in the Soviet Union – and other communist states, for that matter - but in the case of Evgenij Kozlov’s oeuvre from the 1980s, it makes sense to distinguish between censorship in a stricter sense, concerning restrictions on style and subject matter, and censorship in a wider sense, concerning the fact that without a diploma of a higher art school, he was denied the status of a professional artist on formal grounds. Censorship in the stricter sense didn’t apply to his artistic quest. At the beginning of 1982, he noted in his diary:
Completely free with respect to creation, absolutely audacious with respect to forms. (Diary III, p. 3-16)
By contrast, censorship in the wider sense considerably hindered his artistic expression. Being considered an “amateur” artist, the Law on Social Parasitism obliged him to enrol in official jobs, mostly as a graphic designer,[1] which had a serious impact on his creativity. In the same diary, a year later, he referred to those less than ideal conditions:
Art has lost its pace, the number of paintings and graphic works has dropped so much that I’m constantly worrying about the future, feeling guilty about myself and in front of people. (Diary III, p. 3-75-76 more >>) Paradoxically, his art, though often out of the ordinary, rarely came into conflict with censorship when shown publicly. Kozlov participated in public group exhibitions where the number of works by a single artist was never very large, and if Leningrad’s municipal censorship board, the Municipal Exhibition Committee (gorodskoi vystavkom),[2] did not admit a particular work, there was always another one to substitute it.[3] This doesn't mean that Kozlov selected his works for public exhibitions at random. In his diary, there is an example from 1983, which comprises several possible lists for the second exhibition of The Society for Experimental Visual Art, or TEII, an association of independent artists founded in 1982. Catherine Mannick visited the opening and took pictures of the exhibits; digital images of the slides, together with her personal invitation card, are now at the Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies Special Collection (see Slides 1980-1983 – Towards Spiritual Realism and Letter E, May 1983). The pictures show that the final selection included works from different years, among them three compositions from 1982 painted on pages from a chasoslov – a Horologion or book of hours – from the nineteenth century. At first glance, it seems surprising that these works should have passed censorship, but it can be explained. The following quote is from an article from 2021:
Two examples of censorship at public exhibitions, both from 1985, have been documented for E-E Kozlov's work. The first concerns his painted photo-collage polyptych “Good Evening Gustav” from 1984, which wasn’t admitted at the 6th TEII Exhibition in May 1985.[5] The 20-part zigzag-fold, mentioned in the previous chapter, pays homage to Georgy “Gustav” Guryanov. Stylistically, it belongs to Kozlov’s “New Wave” period described in the introduction to Letter G, September 1984.[6]
The second example of censorship is from the “Happy New Year” exhibition at the Leningrad Rock Club in December 1985. The works that didn’t make it, a painting and several painted photos, are from Kozlov’s graffiti art period he called B(L)ack art (see 2. Let’s Talk About Art. New Wave, New Artists, and B(L)ack art). As in the case of the “Good Evening Gustav” zigzag-fold, they fulfil none of the “classical” conditions for censorship: religion, anti-Soviet propaganda or pornography.[7] In all likelihood, they didn’t meet the censors’ taste – “too ‘new wave’, too unusual”, as Kozlov wrote his friend (Letter I, spring 1986) – but the censors also disapproved of the English script on the painting.[8]
There is also a regretful example of self-censorship – Kozlov’s painting CCCP-USA from 1986. Fearing a possible interpretation of a same-sex relationship between the two powers, the artist burnt it on the shore of the Gulf of Finland (see Letter K, August 1986).
It is clear that censorship didn’t vanish overnight: In May 1986, a TEII exhibit wasn’t opened officially because artists refused to take down a number of works. In this case, however, censorship did not apply to Kozlov’s work or works.[9] But in the following years, Leningrad’s Municipal Exhibition Committee seems to have become more lenient, or perhaps simply lost control over the increasing number of public exhibitions. What can be said for sure is that there was no longer any censorship in April 1988, when the first exhibition that presented the New Artists with the group’s name was opened at Leningrad’s Sverdlov House of Culture more >>. Although only eight names appeared on the poster, the exhibition itself saw the works of at least sixteen artists, since, in Timur Novikov words, “The exhibition was organised in the following way: everybody brought along what they saw fit, and no one selected anything from anyone else.” (see Timur Novikov’s exhibition flyer)
In 1990, Kozlov painted “The Big Le-yenin” – Lenin with red eyes, a typical case for censorship on ideological grounds – and presented it twice publicly, at the Mayak House of Culture (see Letter R, March 1990) and at the Union of Artists Exhibition Hall External link to Youtube. At this stage, censorship seems to have been abandoned altogether. Hannelore Fobo, 14 April 2024 [1] Among his workplaces were Peterhof Grand Palace, a supermarket, a hospital, and some other, mostly local places. See Hannelore Fobo. The New Artists. Timur Noikov: Roots – E-E Kozlov: Cosmos. Chapter 11. The Petrodvorets Canteen Combine more >> [2] Тhe municipal exhibition committee (городская выставочная комиссия, gorodskaia vystavochnaia komissiia, shortened ‘gorodskoi vystavkom’) was a division of Leningrad's Main Department of Culture – Главное Управление Культуры Ленгорисполкома, Glavnoe upravlenie kultury Lengorispolkoma. [3] See footnote 8. The issue of censorship might have come to the front with a personal show, but for an “unofficial” artist, this was rather difficult to achieve, although not entirely impossible. It demanded, in the first place, a talent for networking and persuasive communication – not exactly Kozlov’s strong points. [4] Hannelore Fobo. (E-E) Evgenij Kozlov's Participation in the Second TEII Exhibition (1983) in His Diary and Photographs, 2021. Chapter 4: Works on paper: The Peterhof Book of Hours (1982) more >> [5] От Ленинграда к Санкт-Петербургу [6] Around the same time, in the winter of 1985, Kozlov showed this work in a New Artists exhibition of collages at the Erik Goroshevsky Theatre, the theatre section of the literary "Club 81“, and somewhat later, it appeared at an unidentified public exhibit. Like Timur Novikov’s Assa Gallery (see Letter N, part 2), the Erik Goroshevsky Theatre was one of those private and semi-private – uncensored – venues. (see 2. Let’s Talk About Art. New Wave, New Artists, and B(L)ack art). The extent to which these venues were subject to KGB control is a question that has never been answered to anyone’s satisfaction. [7] According to artist and curator Sergey Kovalsky, co-founder of the TEII, the task of the Leningrad City Exhibition Committee was to censor images and titles considered to be religious or anti-Soviet propaganda and pornographic works of art. (Kovalsky et al., TEII, p. 249). Besides, if the criteria for what was banned were more or less clear, their application was not always transparent. The Exhibition Committee required a complete list of all exhibits which it checked with the works displayed before the opening. This often entailed lengthy discussions with the organisers and negotiating “dubious” exhibits. [8] Titles were also likely to attract the censor’s unwanted attention. The full title of the polyptich is ART E. Козлов /Е-Е/ N. 40 „ГУД ИВНИН ГУСТАВ“, that is, ART E. Kozlov /E-E/ No. 40 “Good Evening Gustav’”. For the TEII exhibition, Kozlov did away with the English-sounding title, calling it instead Посвящение Густаву / A dedication to Gustav. It didn’t help. However, like most other artists whose works were (partially) banned, Kozlov was given the right to suggest another work in its place: Кроме этого, предложено СНЯТЬ работы следующих авторов (с правом замены)… / In addition, it is proposed to REMOVE the works of the following authors (with the right to replace them)… (Kovalsky et al., TEII, p. 611). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
see also (E-E) Evgenij Kozlov, Catherine Mannick, and Hannelore Fobo papers, 1979-2022 (inclusive) Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies Special Collection Harvard University >> Published 7 June 2024 Last updated 17 November 2024 |
home // E-E // biographie // art // eros // Leningrad 80s // Valentin Kozlov // 2 x 3m // events // sitemap // kontakt /
|